Showing posts with label Ethics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ethics. Show all posts

Monday, November 7, 2016

TRUMPING THE ISSUES



The fundamental question of this election is do we really want Obama’s third term?  Do we really want a President who will push Obama’s agenda even further to the left?

In 2008, America was facing a terrible economic downturn.  Does anyone really believe that Obama’s trillion dollar “shovel ready” public works, gave America anything close to a real recovery?  Does anyone really think the unemployment numbers are more relevant than the record number of Americans no longer in the workforce?  Does anyone really believe that America’s anemic recovery is the new normal?  Hillary supporters are people who think they and their fellow citizens are economically better off today than 2008. Trump’s message is that America must end the regulations and taxes that have crushed its economy.

In 2008, Americans enjoyed one of the best healthcare systems in the world.  Does anyone really like their current health plan?  Do Americans like paying ever higher premiums and higher deductibles?  Are Americans ready for a completely national healthcare system like Canada or England? 

In 2008, America was the world leader.  Do Americans like the fact that Russia is challenging the U.S., and poses more of a threat, now than at any time since the USSR fell in 1991?  Are Americans willing to watch China consolidate its hegemony in Asia?  Are Americans willing to remain silent as China peels away U.S. allies, like the Philippines, while extending its reach throughout Africa and Central America?

In 2008, the Middle East was dangerous, but at least the major extremist forces were contained.  Are Americans willing to overlook Obama’s refusal to help liberal democratic forces in Iran (the Green Revolution) in 2009 in order to promote Iranian ascendancy ever since?  Are Americans passively accepting that the “Arab Spring” brought peace and freedom to the region?  Are Americans willing to applaud Hillary for her tearing apart Libya, Syria, and Iraq during her time as Secretary of State? Are Jewish Americans really willing to let Hillary continue undermining Israel, the only true democracy in the region? 

In 2016, America is facing a world that is slipping back into 17th and 18th Century trade wars.  The promise of a “flat earth” without policy, technology, or logistical barriers to moving goods, services, and resources has been exploited by China and other state run economies.  America is adrift in how to compete in this “back to the future” trade environment.  Americans are grappling with how to earn a living when robots at home and sweat shop labor abroad obliterate opportunities. 

In 2016, Americans are facing dual invasions that will ultimately destroy our culture and country.  One is illegal immigrants who increase crime and burden social services. The media has been highly successful in deleting “illegal” from any discussion of immigration in order to cast Trump and his supporters as racists or 19th Century “know nothings”. The other invasion is Islamic militants who want to supplant America’s Constitutional freedoms with Sharia law. 

Finally, in 2016, Americans are fed-up with the arrogant unaccountable political elite whose only agenda is to line its own pockets and those of its cronies.  Americans want a real revolution that ends the reign of those who thumb their noses at the law. 

Trump asserts that immigration is a privilege not a right.  Those who America welcomes should be people who will enthusiastically embrace our hard won civic values and bring skills that will revitalize America’s economy.


Trump will drain Washington, DC’s swamp and usher in ethical and accountable government.

Wednesday, August 31, 2016

TRUMPING THE ESTABLISHMENT







The Washington Establishment has a visceral hatred for Trump because he promises to put them out of business.


Why does the Washington Establishment hate Donald Trump? It is not because of his positions on immigration or trade.  Pat Buchanan and Ross Perot advocated similar stands in 1992 and they did not generate the obsessive hatred being displayed in 2016.


Trump has declared war on the Establishment itself.  In his June 16, 2015 Presidential announcement Trump asserted:


“So I’ve watched the politicians. I’ve dealt with them all my life…They will never make America great again. They don’t even have a chance. They’re controlled fully by the lobbyists, by the donors, and by the special interests…it’s destroying our country. We have to stop, and it has to stop now.”


The Washington Establishment sees Trump as serious about them being the primary impediment to making America “great again”.  Trump sees the Establishment as lining their pockets, and their friends’ pockets, as beneficiaries of the status quo.  As long as nothing changes, the Establishment will have their mansions, limousines, VIP tables, and ego trips.


There is much at stake.


Think of Washington, DC as a mass of “cookie jars” each containing delicious treats.  There are those who control the cookie jars, those who want the cookie jars, and those who can get the cookie jars.  Officially, these treats are distributed based on legislative mandates, open competition, and documented needs.  In fact, the treats are almost always handed out to friends, and friends of friends.  Friends can be purchased.  It is Washington, D.C.’s “golden rule” – those with the gold rule.


Welcome to “crony capitalism”.  Someone knowing someone who can hand out favors has been around since the first tribes shared the first harvest.  The term “lobbyist” came from favor seekers hanging out in the lobby of Washington, DC’s Willard Hotel during the Grant Administration in the 1870s.  In 1905, George Washington Plunkett, a ward boss in the Tammany Hall political machine, coined what could be the motto of Washington, D.C. – “What is the Constitution among friends?”


Today, things have gotten way out of hand.  Spending for Washington lobbyists has tripled since 1998 to over $3.22 billion a year.  $24 million is spent for lobbyists each day Congress is in session. 


Campaign fundraising is another dimension of how the Establishment stays in power.  Over $750 million has been raised for House races and $520 million for Senate races this election cycle. Leaders of Political Action Committees (PACs), and individual bundlers who raise funds, dominate this ultimate game of “pay for play”.


Those brokering power become gatekeepers for funding and favors throughout the Federal Government. This power comes from a truism overlooked by everyone in the media – all discretionary federal money is earmarked.  The popular myth is that earmarks vanished once the Republicans banned them when they returned to power in 2011.  They only banned legislative earmarks, and there are still ways to work around that system.  The President, and his appointees, earmark funds as standard operating procedure.  Even career bureaucrats play favorites. 


Favorites can be based on institutional, Administration, and ideological biases.  Favoritism can also go to the highest bidder.  This is federal money flowing out the door as grants, programs, contracts, buildings, leases, and employment.  Other “treats” to be dispensed include regulatory relief, tax waivers, and subsidies. Favoritism is rarely purchased with money directly changing hands, that kind of corruption occurs more in state and local government.  Washington level corruption is true “quid pro quo”.


The Washington Establishment swaps favors more insidiously.  How many times does a military officer get a major position with a defense contractor years after he favored them with a multi-million dollar contract?  A Reagan aide granted a building height waiver near the White House and quadrupled his salary when hired by the developer.  Grant and contract officers obtain slots at prestigious colleges and prep schools for their children for making the “right” choices or being a little lax on oversight.  Bush era National Park officials refused to prosecute the destruction of park land in exchange for Redskins tickets.  Everyone has their price, save for those true public servants.


Trump promises to smash the cookie jars and end the reign of the Establishment. 


Normal Americans are rallying around Trump.  They are enraged at the lies and duplicity of those in power.  Many see a reason to vote for the first time since Reagan. They want November 8, 2016 to be America’s “Bastille Day” marking the end of Washington, DC’s arrogant and unaccountable ruling class.


Billions of dollars are at stake.  Perks, prestige, and power are at stake.  The future of representative government is at stake. Is it any wonder that the Establishment is doing everything and anything to stop Trump?


[Scot Faulkner served as the first Chief Administrative Officer of the U.S, House of Representatives and on Reagan’s White House Staff.  He advises global corporations and governments on strategic change and leadership.]



Friday, November 6, 2015

MAKING ETHICS YOUR LIFE’S MISSION



Keynote Address for the Convocation of the American College of Dentists
Washington, DC; November 5, 2015


The advantage of discussing ethics is that there is always fresh material. People and organizations constantly find new ways to disappoint.


Just this week, the federal government imposed the largest civil penalty in its history – $200 million on Takata for defective air bags. Earlier, company officials tried to comfort consumers stating that their air bags only exploded in humid weather.


Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx stated, “Takata built and sold defective products, refused to acknowledge the defect, and failed to provide full information to its customers or the public. The result of that delay and denial has harmed scores of consumers and caused the largest, most complex safety recall in history.”


Last month, General Motors paid $900 million in fines and settlements for fatal accidents caused by faulty ignition systems.


GM’s CEO admitted, “People were hurt and people died in our cars.”


Also last month, Volkswagen was caught using something called a “defeat device” to pass federal and state emissions tests while emitting up to 40 times the legal limit.


Volkswagen had to pay fines of $7.9 billion in Europe and is paying an additional $3.6 billion in claims in America. This illegal practice was used for six years before being discovered.


In September, the CEO of Turning Pharmaceuticals increased the price of a critically important medication by 5,000 percent stating they had to make a normal profit. The public outcry forced a retreat on this price.


As recently as October 23, the CEO was portraying himself as a martyr saying he was doing people a favor by putting his drug out of reach, “Nobody wants a seven year old drug. They don’t want six month old phones”. I guess he hasn’t heard of Aspirin.       


A few weeks ago, the National Football League proudly announced that September was the first calendar month since 2009 that no active NFL player was arrested.


This brings us to being here in Washington, DC, the epicenter of unethical behavior.


Recent polls show trust in government to be the lowest ever. According to the Gallup Poll, over 60 percent of Americans think our Federal Government is fundamentally corrupt.


This perception is definitely based on reality. It would take the rest of this evening to catalogue what sordid and corrupt things happen in any given month in this town.


Let’s focus on the ethical challenges within Dentistry. This last May, Dalhousie University’s Dental Program had to confront immoral behavior and sex scandals among its graduating class.


Also in May, a Florida dentist was forced to close his practice after a class action suit accused him of torture and abuse of child patients. He was also under investigation by the State of Florida for Medicaid fraud


This June, Medicaid fraud investigators uncovered $191 million in unallowable orthodontic services in Texas. Dentists were putting braces on the teeth of thousands of poor children who didn't need them. Ninety percent of those procedures were against state rules.


One of the few times a dentist led national news was in July when a Minnesota Dentist paid poachers to lure a famous lion away from a wildlife preserve in order to shoot it.


This last case shows your challenge is to bring honor to all aspects of your life. As a leader of your profession, you must be a role model beyond the office.


Ethical lapses seem to be getting worse with broader impact.


What is going on?


WE LIVE IN AN AMORAL AGE.


Not immoral – AMORAL


We live in an age where morals and ethics are not factored into actions – period.


Many only ask “can we do it”, instead of “should we do it”.


At the heart of AMORALITY is only focusing on compliance with laws and regulations.


A person or company pursing AMORAL Compliance without ethical or moral standards loses not only their rudder, they lose their keel.


AMORAL compliance means - when costs need to be cut, or processes expedited, compliance gives way to parsing the law or creative interpretations of the law.


A functionary in Tammany Hall, the 19th Century political machine that ran New York, famously mused, “What is the Constitution among friends?”
This is the essence of AMORALITY.


There is no fast lane to power or riches – unless AMORALITY guides the way. The reason Washington is synonymous with deceit and corruption is that so many people in this city have lost their way. The enticements overwhelm the mission to the point of becoming the mission. Nothing gets done, but everyone on the inside lines their pockets, build their influence, and find ways to cover their tracks.


AMORALITY is not just the domain of politicians.


Too many people; too many companies; embrace AMORALITY.


Their fig leaf is compliance.


They think rudimentary compliance is all that is needed to get through life. As long as the paper trail says we did the right thing – the right thing happened.


The fundamental flaw is that too many start to think compliance is a game they can beat.


Unfortunately for us, most get away with gaming the system, and doing real harm, before they are discovered and brought to justice.


Think of the list of recent examples we just heard. In every case, someone in charge weighed the odds and the costs of real compliance versus going through the motions compliance. There was just enough wiggle room between the law and their reality to cut a corner. The rest is darkness.


Ethics is not something you can charge off on a balance sheet.


Once you approach your work, your patients, your friends, your life, as a series of actions only governed by a set of regulations you have lost your way.


Those who succeed; those who earn and maintain trust; those who build and keep a solid reputation; do not think of compliance – they think of Aspiration.


Compliance should not just be the ceiling you bump up against. Compliance should be the floor from which you strive for excellence.


Here is one more example.


On September 19, a Georgia jury convicted the CEO of American Peanut Company of knowingly allowing tainted food to enter our stores and kill eight people.


It was the first federal felony conviction for a company executive relating to food safety.


Compare this with Hershey Foods - Their sole focus, on a daily basis, is creating products people can trust.


Hershey Foods has provided the world with candy since 1903. I was lucky enough to lead a four-year consulting engagement among their seventeen plants. The aroma therapy alone was worth it.


The difference between Hershey Foods and the Peanut Company of America is Hershey’s obsession with ethics. Every Hershey plant is like an echo chamber of reminders that Hershey products are consumed by children and that every Hershey employee should make candy as if they were taking it home to their own families.


Hershey figured out how to put ethics into their daily routine and hard wire it into their culture.


Here is one way you can be like Hershey - Every one of us manages a personal reputation bank.


We make deposits when we consistently meet the needs of our customers, clients, or patients.


We earn interest when we collaborate with members of our practice and partner with our patients to achieve life-long health.


We expand our capabilities when we recognize and value the input of everyone on our team, including administrative staff.


Our reputation bank can remain healthy and profitable for our entire lives, but only if we understand the lessons of Hershey.


At the heart of every successful organization or person, is an ethical culture. Ethics is not just something you should embrace because it is a “good thing”. For successful companies, and practices,


Ethics is a business imperative. Ethics is a competitive advantage. Ethics builds customer loyalty.


Ethics helps you survive in troubled times. Alternately, Ethical lapses break the connection with your customers and colleagues. Not honoring commitments, arbitrary actions, shoddy workmanship, all destroy the bonds of trust. Trust, once violated, is almost impossible to rebuild.


Erosion of trust then drains deposits and profits from your reputation bank. When ethical lapses become a dominant pattern, grow harmful, or allow lying, cheating, and stealing - there will be a run on your reputation bank. The world is littered with empty reputation banks – just look at carcasses of Enron, Lehman Brothers, Worldcom, Qwest, Tyco, and FREDDIE MAC. In each case - executives thought they could game the system and outsmart reality, but reality eventually won. Violations of ethics are like tweeting, texting, or posting on Facebook – you can delete, but you can’t erase.


You may remove the immediate evidence, but the reality of your actions never goes away.


You are now members of the American College of Dentists. You were chosen because your peers saw you embodying the best of your profession. You are now leaders in promoting the highest ethical standards in dentistry


Think about what it takes to be a leader of ethics. Excellence is not about compliance. It is about aspiring to be the very best and to serve as a role model – not only to your peers, but to colleagues in all professions and to businesses in your community.


Think about the examples of failure you have heard. How many ways did leaders and their teams lose their way? How many ways did a compliance mentality lead to gaming the system?


Now think of Hershey. Think of companies and organizations in your own community that you admire. Find the common thread. At its heart will be people aspiring to be the very best. These are the people who understand and have mastered management of their relationship bank.


Think of how you can be a dentist with a practice that is a role model for others.


From this day forward that is your life’s mission.

Wednesday, April 17, 2013

Republican Dilemma



By Scot Faulkner & Jonathan Riehl

What happens when a Republican candidate is damaged goods? This is the dilemma facing Republicans in the May 7 special election for South Carolina’s 1stCongressional District. The Republican leaning district should have attracted top tier candidates, but after the primary and run off voters are confronted with the ghost of scandals past – former Governor and Representative Mark Sanford.

This is the last thing Republicans needed. Sanford clearly has moral issues; otherwise he would still be married to his first wife and mother to his four children. He is not ethical, otherwise he would not have lied to everyone about his affair, diverted state funds for personal use, and been censured by a 102-11 vote by the South Carolina House of Representatives. His intelligence is questionable, given everything he did to self-immolate in 2009.

Until his fantasy trip on the Appalachian Trail, which to the surprise of everyone extended all the way to Buenos Aires, Sanford was a respected fiscal conservative. Sanford was even making motions towards a presidential run in 2012. What do you do when someone you may agree with on key issues makes your skin crawl?

How could such damaged goods occur in the wake of Republicans launching their strategic rebranding? Before the GOP collapsed into an incestuous echo chamber, there was a conservative intellectual tradition centered on the ancient concept of “Ethos”. This dates to the dawn of Western Civilization and concerns right and wrong choices. Ethics is about choice. Mark Sanford and the current Republican Party is a sad collection of wrong choices.

Some Republican pundits are going through Olympic style gymnastics to justify their support of Sanford. Conservative Talk Radio and Fox News are proclaiming that Sanford’s zipper problem is very different from President Bill Clinton’s zipper problem. They are asserting that one warrants eternal ostracism while the other merits forgiveness. Ironically, in December 1998, Rep. Sanford supported the resignation of adulterous Speaker-wannabe Rep. Bob Livingston, stating, "The bottom line is that he lied under a different oath - the oath to his wife."

Sanford and Clinton are just two in a long line of politicians who are motivated by something other than their heart and mind. The list is wonderfully bi-partisan. Here is the parade of shame from just the last two years: Chris Lee (R-NY), Eric Massa (D-NY), Mark Souder (R-IN), Anthony Weiner (D-NY), and David Wu (D-OR). Mercenary cable news use adultery as a ratings boon during the scandal and then profit on the residuals. Fox hired Sanford as a paid commentator, while CNN and Current TV hired disgraced Governor Elliott Spitzer as a host. This is the antithesis of ethical public behavior. Rome's pre-eminent political thinker, Cicero, defined this as “A good man speaking well”. Cashing-in on the scandal parade is neither.

Partisan acolytes for both sides have had to respond to these sex scandals by biting their tongues and finding ways to overcome sordid details and photos. It would be refreshing to hear just one of them simply say, “Okay, he’s an immoral a##hole, but we need his vote”.

The changing world of mass social media and “Oprah-style” confessionals has altered our politics for the worse. Thankfully, there is still such a thing as indignation, founded on essentially conservative ethical principles.

We have a test case for ethics in this Special Congressional election, which may be overshadowed by the basics of power politics. Republicans want to hold onto every Congressional seat, and deprive Democrats of anything that builds momentum for the November 2014 showdown. However, losing this special election may help Republicans achieve their long term objective to reinvent and reposition themselves for 2014 and 2016. Unfortunately, a Sanford victory sets-up the embarrassing tableau of Speaker Boehner swearing him in while former mistress, Maria Belen Chapur, holds the bible. Sanford would then go on to upstage Floor debates, committee meetings, fundraisers, and rallies.

Republicans clearly are wrestling with a major dilemma - whether the short term hunger for power trumps long term reasoning. Speaker Boehner endorsed Sanford, while the National Republican Congressional Committee has decided not to spend any more money on Sanford’s behalf ahead of the May 7 special election.

These observations come from the different perspectives of the two authors. We both agree that Sanford’s re-insertion into politics offends us both. It is a dilution of serious, ethical, political debate.

Scot Faulkner was Personnel Director for Reagan-Bush and the Chief Administrative Officer of the U.S. House of Representatives. Jonathan Riehl, J.D., Ph.D., is a communications consultant for political campaigns and national nonprofit organizations and former speechwriter for Luntz Research, and instructor in Communications Studies.

Saturday, May 9, 2009

Ethics in the 21st Century



UNIVERSITY OF BUFFALO
THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK
COMMENCEMENT ADDRESS BY SCOT FAULKNER

This day is about you and your loved ones, not about ceremonies or speeches.


However, in these minutes before you receive your diplomas I would like to offer a few words to help guide you into the future.

Commencements are about optimism. You are beginning your adult lives. Your futures are full of hope and opportunities.

But the world you are about to step into is still reeling from an historic meltdown.

I am not just talking about the economy.

The world is suffering from an ethical meltdown that took us over the financial cliff in the first place.

Unethical behavior and misconduct is as old as humankind, but years ago this always seemed to be balanced out by strong and moral leadership in all sectors.

Last week marked the thirtieth anniversary of Margaret Thatcher becoming Prime Minister of England. Her watershed election, followed by Ronald Reagan’s landslide in 1980, ushered in ten years where democracy triumphed, the cold war was won, and businesses prospered. This was an era of amazing moral and ethical courage displayed by Lech Walesa, Václav Havel, Pope John Paul II, and Nelson Mandela.

After the fall of the Berlin Wall, America and the world began to lose their way. The last twenty years has seen a growing trend of weaker leaders in all sectors. In America, we suffered through Presidents Bush and Clinton who were seemingly incapable of honesty and integrity. We watched as the Republicans took over Congress in 1994 promising to end the abuses of the Democrats only to create their own kleptocracy. Last year America decisively ended the Republican era hoping for a new start in a new century.

Unfortunately, the “change we can believe in” has not occurred. Examples are all around us –

• This week the Chairman of the New York Federal Reserve Bank resigned because of questionable stock manipulations.

• In the past few weeks the FBI probed deeper into the sordid business dealings of Representatives Murtha and Rangel.

• Lapses in ethics and financial disclosure knocked-out numerous Presidential appointments.

• A steady stream of Governors, Mayors, and local officials continue to be investigated, indicted, and convicted.

• Every day there are reports on how billions of dollars in TARP money is wasted or diverted.

• There are also daily reports on how, even with a different political party in charge of our government – waste, fraud, and abuse continues.

This ethical meltdown is not just in our government -

• Just this week LA Dodger Manny Ramirez was suspended because of drug use.

• All this year we watched as auto, banking, and insurance executives destroyed their companies, asked for bailouts, and then stuffed their own pockets with bonuses and perks.

• We have watched Stew Parnell, the CEO of the Peanut Company of America, knowingly allow tainted food to enter our stores and kill eight people.

• We watch as brutal dictators in the Sudan and Zimbabwe are welcomed at international conferences while their people are starved and killed.

• We have also watched as our public officials pound the table and play to the cameras, yet take no real action to either punish or prevent.

Where are today’s roles models? Are there any real leaders left?

In his budget message, President Obama stated:

“This crisis is neither the result of a normal turn of the business cycle nor an accident of history. We arrived at this point as a result of an era of profound irresponsibility that engulfed both private and public institutions from some of our largest companies’ executive suites to the seats of power in Washington, D.C. “

Thankfully, in the midst of this “profound irresponsibility” there are some who followed a better path.

There are companies that did not collapse in the financial meltdown.

These companies remain the foundation of our economy and continue giving capitalism and America a good name. They remain successful because they understand the importance of their reputation. Their sole focus, on a daily basis, is creating products people can trust.

Hershey Foods has provided the world with candy since 1903. I was lucky enough to lead a four-year consulting engagement among their seventeen plants. The aroma therapy alone was worth it.

The greatest difference between Hershey Foods and the Peanut Company of America is Hershey’s obsession with ethics. Every Hershey plant is like an echo chamber of reminders that Hershey products are consumed by children and that every Hershey employee should make candy as if they were taking it home to their own families.

The Hershey culture is one of the most positive and uplifting of any corporate culture I have ever encountered. Every employee knows that their every action builds customer trust and loyalty in their products and the Hershey brand.

Half-way around the world, workers in the city of Dubai are also making ethics a way of life. Dubai is one of the most amazing cities on earth. It is like San Francisco at the height of the gold rush. People from every nationality, culture, and religion are pouring in to make their fortunes. The cutting edge of architecture, transportation, and technology are showcased on every corner of the fastest growing city on earth.

At the heart of Dubai’s success is its reputation for safety, honesty, and security.

Dubai’s leaders know that their oil runs out in 2015 and their future depends on reinventing the city as a vibrant business and tourist destination. Dubai sits less than 100 miles from the Iranian coast. Every employee, every policeman, every customs officer, and port security guard know that just one kidnapping, one car bomb, one bribe, or one smuggled gun will erase Dubai’s reputation and end its dream.

I have spent several years advising executives in Dubai. They are focused, like laser beams, on the importance of their reputation. They know that every action is an ethical test they must pass. There is no alternative to earning trust on a daily basis.

That is what should guide our own interactions with customers and colleagues.

Think of it this way - Every one of us manages a personal reputation bank. We make deposits when we consistently meet the needs of our customers, clients, or patients. We earn interest when we collaborate with members of our practice and partner with our patients to achieve life-long health. We expand our capabilities when we recognize and value the input of everyone on our team, including administrative staff.

Our reputation bank can remain healthy and profitable for our entire lives, but only if we understand the lessons of Hershey and Dubai. At the heart of every successful organization, government, or person, is an ethical culture.

Ethics is not just something you should embrace because it is a “good thing”. For successful companies, Ethics is a business imperative.

Ethics is a competitive advantage. Ethics builds customer loyalty. Ethics helps you survive in troubled times.

Alternately, Ethical lapses break the connection with your customers and colleagues. Not honoring commitments, arbitrary actions, shoddy workmanship, all destroy the bonds of trust. Trust, once violated, is almost impossible to rebuild.

Erosion of trust then drains deposits and profits from your reputation bank.

When ethical lapses become a dominant pattern, grow harmful, or allow lying, cheating, and stealing - there will be a run on your reputation bank.

The world is littered with empty reputation banks – just look at carcasses of Enron, Lehman Brothers, and Arthur Andersen. In each case - executives thought they could game the system and outsmart reality, but reality always wins.

Violations of ethics are like twittering, texting, or posting on Facebook – you can delete, but you can’t erase. You may remove the immediate evidence, but the reality of your actions never goes away.

You, your family, and your colleagues can live an ethical life – but how do we reverse the decline in our civic culture? Power does corrupt – and every day politicians find creative new ways to line their pockets.

Twelve years ago Jefferson County, West Virginia was a very corrupt county in a very corrupt state. Most public officials earned income both above and under the table. Republicans and Democrats equally shared in graft and malfeasance.

In 1998, a small group of civic activists, including my wife and me, decided to make a difference. We first identified core values for an ethical community – the rule of law, transparency, citizen involvement, honesty, and pride in what made the community unique. We used the internet to network among caring citizens. We recruited candidates – even running want ads in the local newspapers.

Most importantly, we ran “reform” candidates regardless of party affiliation. The candidates had to pledge to build an ethical community based upon the reform movement’s core values. Liberal Democrats supported reform Republicans. Conservative Republicans supported reform Democrats.

Since 2000 this reform movement has won 41 of its 46 campaigns.

Today, the Jefferson reform movement runs the county government, the school board, and three of the five towns. Nearly half of all Jefferson County voters are linked and mobilized through email, blogs, online forums, and social networks.

Successful political reform can transcend partisanship – you just have to embrace the core values of democracy and work for change at the local level. That is where small actions can have the most impact. During your lives, think about doing something beyond yourselves by strengthening both your local community, and your professional community.

There are role models that span the political spectrum. Ronald Reagan’s motto was “It can be done”, Barack Obama’s is “Yes we can”.

After the ceremony and the parties, make a pledge to yourself to use Ethics as a moral compass to guide you through life. It will well serve you, your loved ones, your colleagues, and your patients both next week and fifty years from now.

Thank you and good luck!





Sunday, August 10, 2008

Embracing Ethics

The sordid tales of politicians having “zipper problems” and then lying and covering-up their foibles are erupting at a sickening rate. Former Senator John Edwards is now on record accusing the media of lying and making-up stories about an affair that was, in fact true. We now know that Edwards was the one spreading lies. Kwame Kilpatrick, the Mayor of Detroit, landed in jail for ignoring his bail arrangements (see my March 25, 2008 blog). He remains unrepentant and defiant to the detriment of his constituents.

It was, therefore, wonderfully restorative to spend that last few days fully immersed in a discussion on professional and health care ethics. The American College of Dentists is developing ways to enhance the ethical standards and practices of dental professionals: dentists, their assistants, students, and faculty. The ACD was founded in 1920 by a group of visionary leaders who believed dentistry must always plan for the future. Their goal is to elevate the standards of dentistry, to encourage graduate study, and to grant Fellowship to those who have done meritorious work. The ACD has long been regarded as the "conscience of dentistry."

I was invited to participate in the ACD’s latest planning session. It was very much like sessions I have attended related to other industries and corporations. It is reassuring that there are so many corporate and industry leaders who understand how important ethics are in assuring integrity and professionalism. In each case, they understand that ethics is an operational imperative and their duty is to make ethics an operational reality. This is no just about doing the “right thing”, but about achieving a competitive advantage in the global marketplace by assuring consistent excellence and earning trust.

It brought to mind two vivid examples of private sector leadership in ethics. In the early 1990’s the Independent Insurance Agents of America hired my team to help them rethink and reposition their industry for the information age. They were concerned that the rise of ATMs would make local insurance agencies obsolete as people would opt to file claims electronically. Extensive meetings with the association's leaders and the staff of ACORD, their industry “think tank”, resulted in discovering the fundamental strength of local insurance agents – their generational knowledge of their clients changing needs. I coined the term “relationship banking” to describe this long-term relationship and the ability to anticipate and assist customer needs based upon earned trust.

More recently, Hershey Foods offered an "early out" retirement package to "thin the ranks" of its supervisors and managers. Unexpectedly, far more people took advantage of this generous offer, leading to a major challenge for their manufacturing operations. They turned to my team to help them build a new generation of leaders.

Hershey is one of the most ethical companies in America. Their top executives understood that it was imperative their new leaders fully embodied their ethical culture. Therefore, the very first action was for Hershey's top executives to define and describe their culture and ethics as tangible, observable, characteristics. They then asked us to identify how their new leaders displayed these characteristics as part of their daily activities.

We asked people to agree or disagree with a series of declarative statements, both as they related to themselves as individuals and for their plant collectively. We assumed people would rate themselves higher than their colleagues so the object was to find the biggest gaps. These gaps helped us target individual, plant-wide, and company-wide interventions to bring the entire organization up to it ethics aspirations. Our interventions were through training or coaching.

Most importantly, Hershey executives were highly active in every step of this process. It was the most vivid display of ethical leadership I have ever witnessed. The result was an “echo-chamber” of validation and affirmation that resounded throughout every level and location of Hershey Foods. The years I spent assisting Hershey Foods were some of the most uplifting in my career.

It is truly unfortunate for our nation that our politicians see ethics as compliance and not as a personal attribute. Even more unfortunate, most politicians see ethics as a “flag of convenience” or more accurately, connivance. As long as they can wave the ethics banner they do not have to actually be ethical. If they are caught being unethical, they parse and pander hoping they can survive the news cycle.

We need to find ways to demand ethical behavior from our elected and appointed officials, at all levels. Only when ethics becomes a fundamental element of our democracy will credibility be restored to our public institutions.

Thursday, July 31, 2008

Running On Empty

Congress is stumbling towards one of its longest summer recesses. The Republicans, for the first time since losing the 2006 elections, are finally acting like a viable opposition party. Their issue is forcing a vote on offshore drilling. Speaker Pelosi is stalling any real action until her pollsters and operatives find a way for Democrats to respond to consumer pain at the pump while not alienating environmentalists.

Once again Washington politicians want Americans to turn to them for leadership, but hope empty rhetoric will suffice. They top Marie Antoinette – it is now “let them eat symbols” instead of “let them eat cake”.

Policy avoidance would be enough for Americans to dislike and distrust Congress. However, members from both parties are also proving they have not lost their appetite for graft and corruption. Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY) is Chairman of the House Ways & Means Committee. He has admitted to raising $12.2 million from companies and individuals, associated with his committee, for the “Charles B. Rangel Center for Public Service”. He has also used his power to earmark tax dollars for his Center. Many of the “gifts” look like back door donations that skirt federal election and tax laws. This sordid paper trail was even too much for The Washington Post, which launched its own investigation and has bluntly editorialized about the whole matter not passing “the smell test”.

Not to be outdone, Senator Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) was indicted by a federal grand jury on seven counts of making false statements to conceal lobbyist gifts. It is the first criminal charges filed against a sitting Senator in fifteen years (when fellow Republican David Durenberger was indicted). This complex web of transactions and undocumented improvements to Stevens’ vacation home are part of a larger FBI probe into corruption within the Alaska state government. In 2006, the FBI raided the offices of six Republican state senators looking for evidence of bribes from the Veco Company. It is no wonder they attracted FBI attention. The six state senators had unfortunately called themselves the “Corrupt Bastards Club or Caucus” to the point of creating coffee mugs and baseball caps emblazoned with “CBC”. Equally unfortunate for Senator Stevens, his son, Ben Stevens was a member of the CBC.

Corruption, dysfunction, issue avoidance, and empty rhetoric have become the framework within which Congress operates. It is dismaying that the Democrat-led institution took less time to lose its way than when it was led by the Republicans. Americans deserve better. We have ninety-seven days before the November elections to demand better.

Friday, July 25, 2008

Housing Woes

House sales continue to slump. The latest figures show a 33.2% drop in new home sales from June 2007. Media and financial pundits have filled the airwaves with complex reasons for the worst housing market since the Great Depression. There is one additional reason they missed – corruption.

Last month Baltimore Mayor Sheila Dixon had to explain receiving thousands of dollars in gifts while providing tax breaks and zoning changes to developer Ronald Lipscomb. She denies any prid-pro-quo and defends the gifts as stemming from a “personal relationship”. A grand jury has been convened to review the matter.

One of the reasons America’s housing bubble has burst is that thousands of houses in hundreds of subdivisions have been built based upon corruption, not market forces. Local governments require economic analysis and market projections to prove the financial viability of a subdivision before it is approved. Yet numerous reports rejected by local zoning officials as being made of “whole cloth” are later overturned by other officials. Why would local officials approve developments that will not make money?

Every house in a subdivision requires at least $1.50 in services for every $1.00 raised in property taxes. This means that residential growth will either bankrupt a community or require major tax increases. In addition, new houses balloon student-teacher ratios, crowd highways, and lengthen emergency response times, creating unacceptable risk and harm. So why would local officials approve developments that will hurt their communities?

These disconnects with reality happen through callous disregard for the community. Unfortunately, this callousness is usually bought and paid for by local developers. Recently, a zoning official retired and went to work for developers. “They are now paying him over the table instead of under the table,” mused an activist.

Rapid sprawl can usually mask this disregard for market forces. Questionable projects make money because so many people are buying anyway. However, when market conditions weaken, these shaky developments crumble like poorly constructed buildings in an earthquake. Pundits looking for reasons for the historic scope and depth of America’s housing slump should explore how the market was first undermined by low ethical standards.