Failure to
perform the most basic of protection functions for the President, his family,
and world leaders visiting the President, is not acceptable. Secret Service Director, Joe Clancy, was
pointedly held accountable for his agency’s failures before the House Homeland Security
Appropriations Subcommittee on March 17.
Defending his being blindsided by agent
misconduct, Clancy asserted, “I brought in my staff. We discussed why I didn’t
know prior to this event. We had a good stern talk about that”.
Members of Congress from both parties were
appalled at Clancy’s bureaucratic response to agent behavior and operational
integrity.
“This is my first test,” said Clancy.
Clancy is wrong on so many fronts. The first test of a leader is their first
interaction with their organization.
Even how they enter their headquarters for the first time is a
test. Tests of leadership occur every
waking moment of a leader’s tenure. To
think otherwise is to fundamentally misunderstand leadership.
Clancy admitted he was appointed to change the
increasingly dysfunctional and unprofessional culture of the Secret
Service. He defended himself by noting
his short tenure and that cultural change takes time.
“With all due respect, I’m just shocked by your
testimony,” said Nita Lowey (D-NY). “Take time to change
the culture? I don’t understand this one bit. It seems to me it should take
time to help people who think this is the culture to get another job.”
Changing an organization’s culture is hard, but not
impossible. The challenge for Secret
Service Director Joe Clancy is to actually want change, lead change, and embody
the change. He can learn from successful
culture changes in the federal government.
There are only a few, but their lessons are universal.
I was lucky enough to be on the leadership team that
turned around the General Services Administration (36,000 employees), and to
lead the team that forever changed the U.S. House of Representatives (14,000
employees).
The Secret
Service employs approximately 6,500 people, including 3,200 special agents,
1,300 Uniformed Division officers, and 2,000 technical, professional and administrative
support personnel. It is much smaller
than the two strategic transformations that succeeded in creating immediate,
tangible, and sustainable change.
There is no excuse for inaction.
Define the
Promised Land
Change fails because there is no clarity of purpose. A leader must visualize every aspect of a
defined outcome. A leader needs to see,
hear, touch, and smell their end point and to understand the timetable for
reaching it. Whether the horizon is six
months, a year, or three years, a leader must see that “Promised Land” and a
general path to reach it. Only then can
a leader communicate that vision to others and to win converts who will assist
them with the journey.
Gerald Carmen took the helm of the General Services
Administration (GSA) on May 26, 1981. His
background as President & CEO of a regional network of auto supply
dealerships gave him the clarity and common sense embodied in every successful
small businessman. He immediately
visualized how core operational services and resources should be provided to
the federal government and set about bringing on board an inner circle of
experts who fundamentally grasped his vision.
I became the first Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) of
the U.S. House of Representatives on January 3, 1995. My experience included working with Carmen at
the GSA, with Quality Management Guru Philip Crosby, and personally leading the
transformation of smaller enterprises within the Peace Corps and the Federal
Aviation Administration. I also had the advantage of absorbing the work of Jim
Nussle’s House transition team. Like
Carmen, I quickly visualized the “Promised Land” and immediately set about
recruiting an inner circle of experts who shared that vision.
A leader’s vision of the Promised Land should be their
very first priority. The only thing that
is clear at the Secret Service is that the Clancy does not know where he or his
agency is going.
Deploy Air Cover
A leader in government needs the backing of someone who
will back their efforts early and often.
Only then will those they lead pay attention. People both inside and outside the agency
must realize that the change is a priority to those that matter and there is no
hope for end running, appealing, stalling, or waiting out the effort.
President Reagan personally told Carmen he would have
everything he needed to either shut down or transform the GSA within six
months. Speaker Gingrich placed ending
corruption in House operations in his manifesto “Contract with America”. Both Carmen and I constantly referenced our
mandate and our patrons to embolden our change agents and allies. Obama, and the Secretary of Homeland Security,
except for some initial remarks, have been low key to the point of silence on
changing the Secret Service.
Strike Hard &
Fast
Joe Clancy was appointed as acting director of the Secret
Service on October 1, 2014, and became its official Director on February 18,
2015. He had 168 days at the helm before
his hearing. Clancy took a small step in
the right direction by reassigning at least four top officials to posts elsewhere in
government. Little else was done.
Within
his first weeks as GSA Administrator, Carmen forcibly reassigned a dozen top
officials, leading to their resignations.
He elevated the three top whistle-blowers to key positions of
leadership. Within his first 100 days he
had completely changed all the leaders of GSA, he had established a “War Room”
to investigate and remove everyone associated with corruption, and he had
created an Operations Center to implement and monitor business-based
performance measures over every major GSA function. Carmen had also begun implementing a
strategic plan to run the GSA based on business principles and to use a
combination of attrition and hiring freezes to flatten GSA’s layers of
management and reduce its workforce from 36,000 down to 20,000.
In
the first hour of my tenure as CAO, I fired the top 48 executives of House
operations. This lopped off the heads of
everyone who had been complicit in, or ambivalent about, corruption. Within the same hour, a team of outside
experts became the “A Ring” for driving change.
By day 20, we had a strategic plan drafted for fundamentally
transforming House operations. By day
45, the CAO “A Ring” had detailed plans, complete with timetables and outcome
measures, ready for 75 distinct reform initiatives. By day 100, over two dozen of the reforms
were already in place with the others awaiting committee approvals.
Unfurl Your Banners
Change
requires ritual and symbolism. Sun Tzu,
the military genius of 4th Century B.C. China, stated it best, “In night-fighting,
then, make much use of signal-fires and drums, and in fighting by day, of flags
and banners, as a means of influencing the ears and eyes of your army.”
At GSA, Carmen, within his first three months,
resurrected a World War II war effort poster – the American Flag with the
slogan “Give it your best”. The poster
went up throughout GSA headquarters.
Carmen constantly reminded employees that they worked for America and that
they should always “give it their best”.
Handing out performance awards and recognitions further echoed this
theme as did promotions. It inspired
increasing numbers of career employees to become fanatics about performance and
service.
At the CAO, we adopted a credo drawn from top global
service providers - “We are serving our country by serving our Congress” within
the first 30 days. Top global companies’
fundamentals of service excellence became the CAO’s “Contract with
Congress”. Wallet-sized hard cards were
given to every CAO employee. Training in
service and operational excellence was provided to all. Awards and recognition, as well as
promotions, reinforced the new culture and won over legions of long time House
employees to the new world of pride and performance.
The Secret Service, 168 days into Clancy’s tenure, has no
organizing symbol or slogan to rally believers to the new order.
Cement Your Sand
Castle
Real change must transcend its inception. Changes must be irreversible. Bridges back to the old ways must be burned
or blown-up. The Promised Land must be
institutionalized through new position descriptions, new titles, new mission
statements, new performance measures, and new incentives. Even new colors and
office configurations play a role.
At GSA, Carmen immediately moved out of the vast
ceremonial office and turned it into a general meeting room. He also repainted the hallways of the
headquarters building (the color scheme remains to this day). His “War Room” eliminated titles and
operations that had outlived their relevance.
New mission statements and position descriptions were installed as he
eradicated the old order. All remain in
place to this day. When corruption tried
to seep into the GSA twenty years later, career employees used to the new
culture of integrity to blow the whistle, defending the integrity of the
reinvented agency.
The Congressional reform removed and sold off furniture,
and worked with the Architect of the Capitol to completely change spaces as
operations were abolished, downsized, or privatized. New mission statements,
position descriptions, core skill requirements, and performance measures were
created as old ones were removed or created where none had previously
existed. Twenty years and two partisan
changes later, everything remains in place.
The Secret Service, and Director Clancy, have much to
learn and much to do – if they are truly sincere.
[Scot Faulkner
served as Chief Administrative Officer for the U.S. House of Representatives,
and as a member of Carmen’s GSA Executive team.]
No comments:
Post a Comment